Hanby Holmes
Reference: D/HH 2 Catalogue Title: Hanby Holmes Area: Catalogue Category: Business and Industry Records (Solicitors) Description: Case Papers: General case papers (part 1)
Covering Dates: 1799-1852
Catalogue Index
Use and to reveal/hide the structure of the catalogue index (requires Javascript to be enabled in your internet browser options). Click to jump directly to information at a specific level of the catalogue.
- Hanby Holmes
- Hanby Holmes (Ref: D/HH)
- Case Papers (Ref: D/HH 2)
- General case papers (Ref: D/HH 2/11)
- Rex v George Cain (Ref: D/HH 2/11/1/1-2)
- Richardson v Thornton (Ref: D/HH 2/11/2/1-4)
- Wright v Coates (Ref: D/HH 2/11/3/1)
- Ale House (Ref: D/HH 2/11/4/1-7)
- Softley v Dixon (Ref: D/HH 2/11/5/1-8)
- Allinson v Matthie (Ref: D/HH 2/11/6/1-2)
- Rex v Carter and Peart (Ref: D/HH 2/11/7/1-6)
- Holmes v Pinkney (Ref: D/HH 2/11/8/1-28)
- Kirby Ravensworth School (Ref: D/HH 2/11/9/1-19)
- Addison v Birkbeck (Ref: D/HH 2/11/10/1-7)
- Butchers (Ref: D/HH 2/11/11/1-6)
- Bayles v Johnson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/12/1-6)
- Newton v White and Tennison (Ref: D/HH 2/11/13/1-2)
- Stuart v Hird (Ref: D/HH 2/11/14/1-6)
- Captain Stamp (Ref: D/HH 2/11/15/1-9)
- Johnson v Robinson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/16/1-6)
- Marshall v Hunter (Ref: D/HH 2/11/17/1)
- Rex v Earl of Pomfret (Ref: D/HH 2/11/18/1)
- Sanderson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/19/1-5)
- Harrison v Holmes (Ref: D/HH 2/11/20/1-2)
- Featherstonhaugh v Hill (Ref: D/HH 2/11/21/1-21)
- Devonshire v Elliott (Ref: D/HH 2/11/22/1-8)
- Michell of Forcett (Ref: D/HH 2/11/23/1-35)
- Raw and Donaldson v Wallis (Ref: D/HH 2/11/24/1-10)
- Rex v Wedgewood (Ref: D/HH 2/11/25/1-4)
- Wiseman v White and White v Thompson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/26/1-24)
- Actions against Bateman (Ref: D/HH 2/11/27/1-24)
- Reed v Taite (Ref: D/HH 2/11/28/1-2)
- George Benson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/29/1)
- Rex v Franks (Ref: D/HH 2/11/30/1-3)
- Lamb's stable (Ref: D/HH 2/11/31/1-2)
- Smith v Claridge (Ref: D/HH 2/11/32/1-6)
- Proctor v Harrison (Ref: D/HH 2/11/33/1-8)
- Addison v Wallis (Ref: D/HH 2/11/34/1-2)
- Rex v Wharton (Ref: D/HH 2/11/35/1-7)
- Swaine v Simpson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/36/1-13)
- Simpson v Unwin, Unwin v Simpson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/37/1-85)
- Rex v Clarkson and Rex v Garth (Ref: D/HH 2/11/38/1-2)
- Wilson and others v Dent and Wilson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/39/1-2)
- Neshams v Robinson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/40/1-126)
- Rex v Cockfield (Ref: D/HH 2/11/41/1-40)
- Rex v Wright (Ref: D/HH 2/11/42/1-36)
- Rowntree v Dent (Ref: D/HH 2/11/43/1-37)
- Cust v Thompson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/44/1-8)
- Milner (Ref: D/HH 2/11/45/1-14)
- Elizabeth Adamthwaite (Ref: D/HH 2/11/46/1)
- Joshua Bousfield (Ref: D/HH 2/11/47/1)
- Wetherall v Law (Ref: D/HH 2/11/48/1-30)
- Wright v Backhouse (Ref: D/HH 2/11/49/1-7)
- Heslop v Colling (Ref: D/HH 2/11/50/1-19)
- Heslop v Colling (Ref: D/HH 2/11/50/20-27)
- Thompson v Raine (Ref: D/HH 2/11/51/1-3)
- Carmichael v Todd and Brownless v Walton (Ref: D/HH 2/11/52/1-17)
- Whitfield (Ref: D/HH 2/11/53/1-14)
- Raine v Fadden (Ref: D/HH 2/11/54/1-5)
- Mawson v Collinson (Ref: D/HH 2/11/55/1-9)
- Rowntree v Middleton (Ref: D/HH 2/11/56/1-14)
- Kipling v Fry (Ref: D/HH 2/11/57/1-17)
- Dodds v Hird (Ref: D/HH 2/11/58/1-13)
Catalogue Description
Miscellaneous Case Papers(in date order)Catalogue Contents
(in date order)
Rex v George Cain (Ref: D/HH 2/11/1/1-2)Ref: D/HH 2/11/1/1-2Unwin v Simpson is a standard prosecution for trespass in pursuit of game. It leads, however, to Simpson v Unwin in a vexatious game prosecution. Unwin, who is qualified to shoot, is the tenant of Lartington. Simpson is trying to get back at him in the narrow wording of an Act of George II whereby possession of game out of season may be construed as an offence.
Ref: D/HH 2/11/37/1(See also D/HH 2/18/109-127)
Ref: D/HH 2/11/43/1Third Deposit
(Acc: 1322(D))